A network for historic guitars and vihuelas
Add a Comment
:-) And an attractive instrument indeed.
Yes. Very sorry. I have to see if I can change that, thanks.
So actually the drawing must be from ca. 1585, not 1685?
This is the third illustration in Michael Fink's LSA article about a possible split 4th course on the 4 course guitar. Like I said, I don't have any strong opinions about this, but find the instrument very attractive. The left hand spacing is hard to explain. In the article Michael connects the missing portion of the 4th course octave to the bridge with photo shop.
© 2025 Created by Jelma van Amersfoort. Powered by
You need to be a member of Early Guitars and Vihuela to add comments!
Join Early Guitars and Vihuela